FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - The U.S. Army needs to maintain a force that it can afford to equip, Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the Army's vice chief of staff, said here at a conference hosted by the Association of the U.S. Army.
"I believe we've got to have a balance in our equipment accounts and our personnel accounts to make sure that we have an Army that we need, but that Army must be well-equipped," Chiarelli told the audience Feb. 23.
The Army's active force is at 570,000, which includes 22,000 soldiers allowed under a temporary end strength increase.
The Army will reduce the force back to 547,000 over an 18-month period that begins in the middle of 2012.
"That is all enlisted soldiers; it is not officers," Chiarelli said. "Some of it will be done through attrition; some of it will be done through quality points."
In January, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced the Army would cut an additional 27,000 soldiers from the force beginning in 2015.
Chiarelli said that for this drawdown, Gates laid out three assumptions: The Army leaves Iraq, there is a significant drawdown of U.S. forces in Afghanistan between now and 2014, and there are no additional contingencies requiring a large number of ground forces.
"I would add a fourth, and that fourth is that we have the right access we need to the reserve components," Chiarelli said. "We absolutely have to have an operationalized reserve."
That means Reserve forces that deploy for a year and are at home for four to five years in between, Chiarelli said.
"If all of those assumptions prove to be correct, I think it is prudent at this time to do the planning, and [Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey] calls it 'reversible planning' and I like that term, to take the force down to 520,000," Chiarelli said.
Lt. Gen. Thomas Bostick, deputy chief of staff for personnel (G-1), is leading that planning and conducting the analysis to figure out how best to reduce the force.
If those four assumptions do not come true, Casey feels very strongly that he can go back to Gates and discuss the reduction of 27,000 troops, Chiarelli said.
However, Casey's term as chief comes to an end this spring, and it's unlikely Gates will still be the defense secretary when these decisions will have to be made.
In the past, the Army has done whatever it can to protect end strength, including robbing equipment accounts, Chiarelli said.
"I happen to believe that there are certain folks who feel the Army's end strength should be such, and if we were to protect that strength at the cost of equipping accounts, in the end we'd end up with a much smaller Army, poorly equipped," he said.
The reason, he said, is because someone could always come in after the Army robs its equipment accounts to protect its size and cut force structure anyway.
In addition to keeping personnel and equipment accounts in relative balance, the Army needs to stop the yearly increase in costs in its personnel accounts, Chiarelli said.
Right now, those accounts grow at a rate of 1.4 percent a year, Chiarelli noted, saying that is a "significant" number across the multiyear spending plan.
"I believe we've got to have a balance in our equipment accounts and our personnel accounts to make sure that we have an Army that we need, but that Army must be well-equipped," Chiarelli told the audience Feb. 23.
The Army's active force is at 570,000, which includes 22,000 soldiers allowed under a temporary end strength increase.
The Army will reduce the force back to 547,000 over an 18-month period that begins in the middle of 2012.
"That is all enlisted soldiers; it is not officers," Chiarelli said. "Some of it will be done through attrition; some of it will be done through quality points."
In January, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced the Army would cut an additional 27,000 soldiers from the force beginning in 2015.
Chiarelli said that for this drawdown, Gates laid out three assumptions: The Army leaves Iraq, there is a significant drawdown of U.S. forces in Afghanistan between now and 2014, and there are no additional contingencies requiring a large number of ground forces.
"I would add a fourth, and that fourth is that we have the right access we need to the reserve components," Chiarelli said. "We absolutely have to have an operationalized reserve."
That means Reserve forces that deploy for a year and are at home for four to five years in between, Chiarelli said.
"If all of those assumptions prove to be correct, I think it is prudent at this time to do the planning, and [Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey] calls it 'reversible planning' and I like that term, to take the force down to 520,000," Chiarelli said.
Lt. Gen. Thomas Bostick, deputy chief of staff for personnel (G-1), is leading that planning and conducting the analysis to figure out how best to reduce the force.
If those four assumptions do not come true, Casey feels very strongly that he can go back to Gates and discuss the reduction of 27,000 troops, Chiarelli said.
However, Casey's term as chief comes to an end this spring, and it's unlikely Gates will still be the defense secretary when these decisions will have to be made.
In the past, the Army has done whatever it can to protect end strength, including robbing equipment accounts, Chiarelli said.
"I happen to believe that there are certain folks who feel the Army's end strength should be such, and if we were to protect that strength at the cost of equipping accounts, in the end we'd end up with a much smaller Army, poorly equipped," he said.
The reason, he said, is because someone could always come in after the Army robs its equipment accounts to protect its size and cut force structure anyway.
In addition to keeping personnel and equipment accounts in relative balance, the Army needs to stop the yearly increase in costs in its personnel accounts, Chiarelli said.
Right now, those accounts grow at a rate of 1.4 percent a year, Chiarelli noted, saying that is a "significant" number across the multiyear spending plan.
