Pakistan and China will hold two joint military exercises in 2011, a Pakistani senior military leader said Tuesday.
The two exercises, one army drill and one air force one, will be held to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between Pakistan and China, said General Khalid Shameem Wynne, chairman of Pakistan's Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee.
Wynne, who is paying a five-day visit to China, told reporters that the two countries will also participate in a multinational navy drill in March.
Wynne hailed the strategic partnership between Pakistan and China, saying it is "the best example" of bilateral ties and a "stabilizing force" in the region.
"The China-Pakistan partnership is a source of comfort and stability for the entire region," Wynne said.
The visit is Wynne's first official visit to China since he was promoted to the rank of general and assumed his present position in October 2010.
In July 2010, Wynne led a joint anti-terrorism drill between Pakistan and China in Qingtongxia in northwest China's Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Pakistan, China to Hold Joint Military Exercises in 2011
Afghanistan Seeks U.S. Help Post-2014
WASHINGTON - Afghanistan on Feb. 23 appealed for the United States to provide security assistance beyond 2014, the date by which President Barack Obama wants to withdraw U.S. combat troops.
Afghan Defense Minister Abdul Rahim Wardak was holding talks at the Pentagon to look at future relations, despite recent tensions between the two governments over civilian deaths in the NATO-led campaign against the Taliban.
"We do strongly believe that for Afghanistan to be able to survive in that very volatile region, it will need your help beyond 2014," Wardak said at the start of a meeting with U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
Wardak saluted the nearly 1,500 U.S. troops who have died in America's longest war, which was launched in 2001 to root out al-Qaeda extremists responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.
"We should be extremely grateful for all the sacrifices which your sons and daughters have given," Wardak said.
Gates said that such meetings on future security relations would take place twice annually between the two countries, with one session each year involving the U.S. defense secretary.
Gates hoped that the forum would lay "an enduring foundation for our partnership well beyond 2014."
The meetings should "demonstrate to others in the region and to our own people, in concrete terms, that together we are putting Afghanistan on a path towards stability and security," Gates said.
Opinion polls show dwindling U.S. public support for the war in Afghanistan, with many in the public questioning the continued human and financial toll nearly a decade after troops were first deployed.
Obama has poured more troops into Afghanistan but said that he will start pulling them out in July this year. However, the administration has recently shifted focus and emphasized 2014 as the date by which U.S. troops will leave.
The Obama administration has repeatedly said that the United States will remain committed to assisting Afghanistan in 2014, even if the military component winds down.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, right, and Ambassador Earl Anthony Wayne, left, listen Feb. 23 as they meet with Defense Minister of Afghanistan Abdul Rahim Wardak at the Pentagon. (Alex Wong / Getty Images)
"We do strongly believe that for Afghanistan to be able to survive in that very volatile region, it will need your help beyond 2014," Wardak said at the start of a meeting with U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
Wardak saluted the nearly 1,500 U.S. troops who have died in America's longest war, which was launched in 2001 to root out al-Qaeda extremists responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.
"We should be extremely grateful for all the sacrifices which your sons and daughters have given," Wardak said.
Gates said that such meetings on future security relations would take place twice annually between the two countries, with one session each year involving the U.S. defense secretary.
Gates hoped that the forum would lay "an enduring foundation for our partnership well beyond 2014."
The meetings should "demonstrate to others in the region and to our own people, in concrete terms, that together we are putting Afghanistan on a path towards stability and security," Gates said.
Opinion polls show dwindling U.S. public support for the war in Afghanistan, with many in the public questioning the continued human and financial toll nearly a decade after troops were first deployed.
Obama has poured more troops into Afghanistan but said that he will start pulling them out in July this year. However, the administration has recently shifted focus and emphasized 2014 as the date by which U.S. troops will leave.
The Obama administration has repeatedly said that the United States will remain committed to assisting Afghanistan in 2014, even if the military component winds down.
Russia Outlines 10-Year $640B Buying Plans
MOSCOW - Russian officials have revealed a few details about Moscow's $640 billion effort to bring 80 percent of the military's arsenal up to modern standards by 2020.
The defense ministry will buy about 600 airplanes and more than 1,000 helicopters, Vladimir Popovkin, the first deputy defense minister in charge of arms procurement, told reporters Feb. 24. About 100 helicopters will be purchased this year, Popovkin said.
The Navy should receive about 100 new vessels, including 35 corvettes, 15 frigates and 20 submarines. Of the submarines, eight should be of the nuclear Borei class, carrying Bulava multiwarhead naval intercontinental ballistic missiles that the ministry plans to commission later this year after additional tests.
The ministry will fund the development of a new liquid-fuel heavy intercontinental ballistic missile, to replace aging RS-18 Stilleto (SS-19 NATO codename) and RS-20 Satan (SS-18 NATO codename), Popovkin said. Such missiles can carry up to 10 warheads, he said, while solid fuel missiles, such as Topol, can carry maximum three warheads.
Russia will buy 10 batteries of the advanced S-500 anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense missiles, expected to be put in service in 2014, as well as 56 S-400 missile batteries.
Ten percent of the money, or about $64 billion, will be spent on developing new weaponry, Popovkin sai. This means nearly tripling annual spending on the research and design, he said.
The program envisages the procurement of two Mistral aircraft carriers, in addition to the two that Russia is buying from France, as well as Iveco light multirole vehicles from Italy. The military does not plan massive procurement of the foreign-made weapons, though small batches of drones, sniper guns and French-made Felin infantry combat suits will be bought by the Russian Armed Forces, Popovich said.
Seventy percent of the money under the program is supposed to be spent after 2015, he said.
The government will lend $24 billion to defense companies to help them prepare for bigger contracts after 2015.
The defense ministry will buy about 600 airplanes and more than 1,000 helicopters, Vladimir Popovkin, the first deputy defense minister in charge of arms procurement, told reporters Feb. 24. About 100 helicopters will be purchased this year, Popovkin said.
The Navy should receive about 100 new vessels, including 35 corvettes, 15 frigates and 20 submarines. Of the submarines, eight should be of the nuclear Borei class, carrying Bulava multiwarhead naval intercontinental ballistic missiles that the ministry plans to commission later this year after additional tests.
The ministry will fund the development of a new liquid-fuel heavy intercontinental ballistic missile, to replace aging RS-18 Stilleto (SS-19 NATO codename) and RS-20 Satan (SS-18 NATO codename), Popovkin said. Such missiles can carry up to 10 warheads, he said, while solid fuel missiles, such as Topol, can carry maximum three warheads.
Russia will buy 10 batteries of the advanced S-500 anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense missiles, expected to be put in service in 2014, as well as 56 S-400 missile batteries.
Ten percent of the money, or about $64 billion, will be spent on developing new weaponry, Popovkin sai. This means nearly tripling annual spending on the research and design, he said.
The program envisages the procurement of two Mistral aircraft carriers, in addition to the two that Russia is buying from France, as well as Iveco light multirole vehicles from Italy. The military does not plan massive procurement of the foreign-made weapons, though small batches of drones, sniper guns and French-made Felin infantry combat suits will be bought by the Russian Armed Forces, Popovich said.
Seventy percent of the money under the program is supposed to be spent after 2015, he said.
The government will lend $24 billion to defense companies to help them prepare for bigger contracts after 2015.
AUSA: Protecting End Strength Runs Risks, Says Chiarelli
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - The U.S. Army needs to maintain a force that it can afford to equip, Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the Army's vice chief of staff, said here at a conference hosted by the Association of the U.S. Army.
"I believe we've got to have a balance in our equipment accounts and our personnel accounts to make sure that we have an Army that we need, but that Army must be well-equipped," Chiarelli told the audience Feb. 23.
The Army's active force is at 570,000, which includes 22,000 soldiers allowed under a temporary end strength increase.
The Army will reduce the force back to 547,000 over an 18-month period that begins in the middle of 2012.
"That is all enlisted soldiers; it is not officers," Chiarelli said. "Some of it will be done through attrition; some of it will be done through quality points."
In January, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced the Army would cut an additional 27,000 soldiers from the force beginning in 2015.
Chiarelli said that for this drawdown, Gates laid out three assumptions: The Army leaves Iraq, there is a significant drawdown of U.S. forces in Afghanistan between now and 2014, and there are no additional contingencies requiring a large number of ground forces.
"I would add a fourth, and that fourth is that we have the right access we need to the reserve components," Chiarelli said. "We absolutely have to have an operationalized reserve."
That means Reserve forces that deploy for a year and are at home for four to five years in between, Chiarelli said.
"If all of those assumptions prove to be correct, I think it is prudent at this time to do the planning, and [Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey] calls it 'reversible planning' and I like that term, to take the force down to 520,000," Chiarelli said.
Lt. Gen. Thomas Bostick, deputy chief of staff for personnel (G-1), is leading that planning and conducting the analysis to figure out how best to reduce the force.
If those four assumptions do not come true, Casey feels very strongly that he can go back to Gates and discuss the reduction of 27,000 troops, Chiarelli said.
However, Casey's term as chief comes to an end this spring, and it's unlikely Gates will still be the defense secretary when these decisions will have to be made.
In the past, the Army has done whatever it can to protect end strength, including robbing equipment accounts, Chiarelli said.
"I happen to believe that there are certain folks who feel the Army's end strength should be such, and if we were to protect that strength at the cost of equipping accounts, in the end we'd end up with a much smaller Army, poorly equipped," he said.
The reason, he said, is because someone could always come in after the Army robs its equipment accounts to protect its size and cut force structure anyway.
In addition to keeping personnel and equipment accounts in relative balance, the Army needs to stop the yearly increase in costs in its personnel accounts, Chiarelli said.
Right now, those accounts grow at a rate of 1.4 percent a year, Chiarelli noted, saying that is a "significant" number across the multiyear spending plan.
"I believe we've got to have a balance in our equipment accounts and our personnel accounts to make sure that we have an Army that we need, but that Army must be well-equipped," Chiarelli told the audience Feb. 23.
The Army's active force is at 570,000, which includes 22,000 soldiers allowed under a temporary end strength increase.
The Army will reduce the force back to 547,000 over an 18-month period that begins in the middle of 2012.
"That is all enlisted soldiers; it is not officers," Chiarelli said. "Some of it will be done through attrition; some of it will be done through quality points."
In January, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced the Army would cut an additional 27,000 soldiers from the force beginning in 2015.
Chiarelli said that for this drawdown, Gates laid out three assumptions: The Army leaves Iraq, there is a significant drawdown of U.S. forces in Afghanistan between now and 2014, and there are no additional contingencies requiring a large number of ground forces.
"I would add a fourth, and that fourth is that we have the right access we need to the reserve components," Chiarelli said. "We absolutely have to have an operationalized reserve."
That means Reserve forces that deploy for a year and are at home for four to five years in between, Chiarelli said.
"If all of those assumptions prove to be correct, I think it is prudent at this time to do the planning, and [Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey] calls it 'reversible planning' and I like that term, to take the force down to 520,000," Chiarelli said.
Lt. Gen. Thomas Bostick, deputy chief of staff for personnel (G-1), is leading that planning and conducting the analysis to figure out how best to reduce the force.
If those four assumptions do not come true, Casey feels very strongly that he can go back to Gates and discuss the reduction of 27,000 troops, Chiarelli said.
However, Casey's term as chief comes to an end this spring, and it's unlikely Gates will still be the defense secretary when these decisions will have to be made.
In the past, the Army has done whatever it can to protect end strength, including robbing equipment accounts, Chiarelli said.
"I happen to believe that there are certain folks who feel the Army's end strength should be such, and if we were to protect that strength at the cost of equipping accounts, in the end we'd end up with a much smaller Army, poorly equipped," he said.
The reason, he said, is because someone could always come in after the Army robs its equipment accounts to protect its size and cut force structure anyway.
In addition to keeping personnel and equipment accounts in relative balance, the Army needs to stop the yearly increase in costs in its personnel accounts, Chiarelli said.
Right now, those accounts grow at a rate of 1.4 percent a year, Chiarelli noted, saying that is a "significant" number across the multiyear spending plan.
U.S. Air Force Tanker Award Expected Feb. 24
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Defense Department is expected to announce Feb. 24 the winner of a $35 billion Air Force aerial refueling tanker contract fought over by Boeing and European rival EADS for nearly a decade.
Congressional aides told AFP the award of one of the biggest procurement contracts in U.S. history would come Feb. 24.
The Pentagon declined to comment on the matter.
The Defense Department is seeking to replace 179 tankers in an aging U.S. Air Force fleet of Boeing KC-135s that date back to the 1950s.
In the high-stakes, politically charged battle, U.S. aerospace giant Boeing and the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company, parent of France-based Airbus, delivered their final bids by last Friday's deadline.
EADS is looking like the favorite to land the contract, said Loren Thompson, an analyst at the Lexington Institute think-tank based just outside the U.S. capital.
"Judging from the frequency with which Pentagon acquisition chief Ashton Carter has been talking up the notion of a 'globalized' defense market recently, European aerospace giant EADS is the winner," Thompson said in an online blog.
Thompson said the Air Force would announce the winner Feb. 24 after the financial markets close.
The first time the contract was awarded, it went to Boeing, but it was subsequently canceled amid a Pentagon procurement scandal.
EADS won the contract in 2008 along with U.S. partner Northrop Grumman, but the decision was withdrawn after the Government Accountability Office upheld Boeing's objections that the process was flawed.
EADS is now competing without a main partner, but with support from a number of U.S. equipment makers.
EADS North America chairman Ralph Crosby said last week the firm had lowered the price of its final bid to a "very competitive price proposal."
Boeing's chief executive Jim McNerney earlier described his firm's bid as an "aggressive" attempt to beat its "subsidized" European rival.
This third attempt is marked by fierce lobbying from lawmakers seeking jobs in their states - for Boeing, in Washington state and Kansas; for Airbus, in Alabama - with the added dimension of a long-running trade dispute between the United States and the European Union at the World Trade Organization over public subsidies for Boeing and Airbus.
The Defense Department insists the winner will be decided on the merits of its bid.
Thompson cautioned that the Pentagon announcement may not close the book on the matter.
"Boeing could challenge the rating methodology and several other facets of the selection process, but since price is the key discriminator in the outcome, it is more likely to pursue a political strategy focusing on EADS use of prohibited trade subsidies in developing and marketing its planes," he said.
The rivals are offering militarized versions of their commercial aircraft and promising the contract would add tens of thousands of jobs to the post-recession U.S. economy still struggling with high unemployment.
The EADS KC-45 is based on the long-haul Airbus 330. EADS says it has 31 percent more capacity and a longer range than Boeing's offer, the KC-767.
It would be assembled in Mobile, Alabama, where EADS expects to produce at least 12 aircraft a year and says the program would create 48,000 jobs.
Representatives of Mobile area organizations, including city and county officials, plan to gather at the Mobile Convention Center to await the expected announcement and have scheduled a news conference, county official Peter Albrecht told AFP.
Boeing spokespersons were not immediately available to comment on the looming announcement.
Boeing is proposing the KC-767, or NewGen Tanker, built around its long-haul 767 plane. The bigger Boeing plane would be assembled in Everett, Washington, and equipped in Wichita, Kansas. Boeing says a win would provide 50,000 jobs.
Congressional aides told AFP the award of one of the biggest procurement contracts in U.S. history would come Feb. 24.
The Pentagon declined to comment on the matter.
The Defense Department is seeking to replace 179 tankers in an aging U.S. Air Force fleet of Boeing KC-135s that date back to the 1950s.
In the high-stakes, politically charged battle, U.S. aerospace giant Boeing and the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company, parent of France-based Airbus, delivered their final bids by last Friday's deadline.
EADS is looking like the favorite to land the contract, said Loren Thompson, an analyst at the Lexington Institute think-tank based just outside the U.S. capital.
"Judging from the frequency with which Pentagon acquisition chief Ashton Carter has been talking up the notion of a 'globalized' defense market recently, European aerospace giant EADS is the winner," Thompson said in an online blog.
Thompson said the Air Force would announce the winner Feb. 24 after the financial markets close.
The first time the contract was awarded, it went to Boeing, but it was subsequently canceled amid a Pentagon procurement scandal.
EADS won the contract in 2008 along with U.S. partner Northrop Grumman, but the decision was withdrawn after the Government Accountability Office upheld Boeing's objections that the process was flawed.
EADS is now competing without a main partner, but with support from a number of U.S. equipment makers.
EADS North America chairman Ralph Crosby said last week the firm had lowered the price of its final bid to a "very competitive price proposal."
Boeing's chief executive Jim McNerney earlier described his firm's bid as an "aggressive" attempt to beat its "subsidized" European rival.
This third attempt is marked by fierce lobbying from lawmakers seeking jobs in their states - for Boeing, in Washington state and Kansas; for Airbus, in Alabama - with the added dimension of a long-running trade dispute between the United States and the European Union at the World Trade Organization over public subsidies for Boeing and Airbus.
The Defense Department insists the winner will be decided on the merits of its bid.
Thompson cautioned that the Pentagon announcement may not close the book on the matter.
"Boeing could challenge the rating methodology and several other facets of the selection process, but since price is the key discriminator in the outcome, it is more likely to pursue a political strategy focusing on EADS use of prohibited trade subsidies in developing and marketing its planes," he said.
The rivals are offering militarized versions of their commercial aircraft and promising the contract would add tens of thousands of jobs to the post-recession U.S. economy still struggling with high unemployment.
The EADS KC-45 is based on the long-haul Airbus 330. EADS says it has 31 percent more capacity and a longer range than Boeing's offer, the KC-767.
It would be assembled in Mobile, Alabama, where EADS expects to produce at least 12 aircraft a year and says the program would create 48,000 jobs.
Representatives of Mobile area organizations, including city and county officials, plan to gather at the Mobile Convention Center to await the expected announcement and have scheduled a news conference, county official Peter Albrecht told AFP.
Boeing spokespersons were not immediately available to comment on the looming announcement.
Boeing is proposing the KC-767, or NewGen Tanker, built around its long-haul 767 plane. The bigger Boeing plane would be assembled in Everett, Washington, and equipped in Wichita, Kansas. Boeing says a win would provide 50,000 jobs.
New Shipyard's Board of Directors Named
Six prospective board members of the new shipyard to be formed from Northrop Grumman were named Feb. 22 in an internal company memo.
The six members include a former deputy chief of naval operations (CNO) and the former head of Newport News Shipbuilding.
The proposed Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) would be spun off from the existing shipyards of Northrop Grumman, and would include the yards at Newport News, Va., Pascagoula, Miss., and New Orleans, La. Northrop has put the yards up for sale as a single entity, but also is moving ahead with plans to spin them off as HII should a satisfactory buyer fail to emerge.
The prospective board members were named in a memo from current Northrop shipbuilding head Mike Petters, who would also stay on as HII's head of shipbuilding. A copy of the memo was obtained by Defense News.
The six are:
■ Paul D. Miller, a retired U.S. Navy admiral who left the service in 1994 after serving as the deputy CNO and as the head of the U.S. Atlantic Command. From 1999 to 2005 he was chairman and chief executive officer for Alliant Techsystems, an aerospace and defense company.
■ Tom Schievelbein, lead director of New York Life Insurance Co. and Petters' predecessor as head of the Newport News shipyard from 2001 to 2004.
■ Robert Bruner, dean of the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia.
■ Artur Davis, a partner at the law firm SNR Denton, who served from 2003 to 2011 as the Democratic representative to Congress from Alabama's Seventh Congressional District.
■ Anastasia Kelly, a partner at the law firm of DLA Piper and, from 2006 to 2010, an executive vice president and general counsel with American International Group (AIG).
■ Karl von der Heyden, co-chairman of the American Academy in Berlin, Germany and, from 1996 to 2001, vice chairman of the board of directors of PepsiCo Inc.
Retired U.S. Navy admiral Thomas B. Fargo was named in November as HII's prospective non-executive chairman of the board.
No timetable has been publicly announced for the proposed spinoff, but, barring any major obstacles, it is expected to take place around April.
The six members include a former deputy chief of naval operations (CNO) and the former head of Newport News Shipbuilding.
The proposed Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) would be spun off from the existing shipyards of Northrop Grumman, and would include the yards at Newport News, Va., Pascagoula, Miss., and New Orleans, La. Northrop has put the yards up for sale as a single entity, but also is moving ahead with plans to spin them off as HII should a satisfactory buyer fail to emerge.
The prospective board members were named in a memo from current Northrop shipbuilding head Mike Petters, who would also stay on as HII's head of shipbuilding. A copy of the memo was obtained by Defense News.
The six are:
■ Paul D. Miller, a retired U.S. Navy admiral who left the service in 1994 after serving as the deputy CNO and as the head of the U.S. Atlantic Command. From 1999 to 2005 he was chairman and chief executive officer for Alliant Techsystems, an aerospace and defense company.
■ Tom Schievelbein, lead director of New York Life Insurance Co. and Petters' predecessor as head of the Newport News shipyard from 2001 to 2004.
■ Robert Bruner, dean of the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the University of Virginia.
■ Artur Davis, a partner at the law firm SNR Denton, who served from 2003 to 2011 as the Democratic representative to Congress from Alabama's Seventh Congressional District.
■ Anastasia Kelly, a partner at the law firm of DLA Piper and, from 2006 to 2010, an executive vice president and general counsel with American International Group (AIG).
■ Karl von der Heyden, co-chairman of the American Academy in Berlin, Germany and, from 1996 to 2001, vice chairman of the board of directors of PepsiCo Inc.
Retired U.S. Navy admiral Thomas B. Fargo was named in November as HII's prospective non-executive chairman of the board.
No timetable has been publicly announced for the proposed spinoff, but, barring any major obstacles, it is expected to take place around April.
China Pledges Effort to Revive Stalled Nuke Talks
SEOUL - China will work to revive stalled talks on North Korea's nuclear disarmament and to maintain peace on the Korean peninsula, Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi said Feb. 23 during a visit to South Korea.
But Yang, in comments before he began private talks with his counterpart Kim Sung-Hwan, did not mention the North's uranium enrichment program, which has sparked international concern.
China will seek an early resumption of the talks "to realize denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and normalization of relations between related countries", Yang said.
The talks, which group the two Koreas, the United States, China, Japan and Russia, have been stalled since December 2008. The North abandoned them in April 2009 and conducted a second nuclear test a month later.
Seoul, Washington and Tokyo say Pyongyang should improve inter-Korean ties before the nuclear dialogue can resume.
Yang said China would work with other countries including South Korea "to pursue peace, stability and development" on the peninsula.
His visit was originally scheduled for last November but was postponed after the North's deadly shelling of a South Korean border island.
China's failure publicly to condemn the North for that attack sparked irritation in Seoul, as did its refusal to identify the North as the culprit in the sinking of a South Korean warship last March.
Minister Kim said some South Koreans "raised concerns about our bilateral relationship" following the two incidents, but that ties had improved.
South Korean officials said earlier they expected the ministers to discuss the North's uranium program.
The nuclear-armed North last November disclosed an apparently operational uranium enrichment plant to visiting U.S. experts, giving it a potential second way of making atomic bombs.
Pyongyang claims the program is for peaceful energy development but experts say it could easily be converted to produce weapons-grade uranium.
Japan and South Korea have urged the United Nations Security Council to take up the issue with a view to possible punishment.
China opposes taking the issue to the world body even though President Hu Jintao has expressed concern at reports of the program.
China has warned its Security Council partners that it intends to block publication of a report on the subject, a diplomat at the United Nations told AFP last week.
The report says the North almost certainly has at least one other undisclosed enrichment-related facility and describes the uranium program as a serious violation of U.N. sanctions.
Beijing insists on the issue being discussed when six-party talks are revived.
President Lee Myung-Bak urged China to play a "constructive role" in resolving the nuclear crisis when he met Yang later, according to the presidential office.
Lee also stressed that a genuine change in North Korea's attitude is necessary for peace on the peninsula, it said.
Yang reportedly reaffirmed Beijing's objections to Pyongyang's nuclear weapons development and expressed hope inter-Korean relations would improve.
But Yang, in comments before he began private talks with his counterpart Kim Sung-Hwan, did not mention the North's uranium enrichment program, which has sparked international concern.
China will seek an early resumption of the talks "to realize denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and normalization of relations between related countries", Yang said.
The talks, which group the two Koreas, the United States, China, Japan and Russia, have been stalled since December 2008. The North abandoned them in April 2009 and conducted a second nuclear test a month later.
Seoul, Washington and Tokyo say Pyongyang should improve inter-Korean ties before the nuclear dialogue can resume.
Yang said China would work with other countries including South Korea "to pursue peace, stability and development" on the peninsula.
His visit was originally scheduled for last November but was postponed after the North's deadly shelling of a South Korean border island.
China's failure publicly to condemn the North for that attack sparked irritation in Seoul, as did its refusal to identify the North as the culprit in the sinking of a South Korean warship last March.
Minister Kim said some South Koreans "raised concerns about our bilateral relationship" following the two incidents, but that ties had improved.
South Korean officials said earlier they expected the ministers to discuss the North's uranium program.
The nuclear-armed North last November disclosed an apparently operational uranium enrichment plant to visiting U.S. experts, giving it a potential second way of making atomic bombs.
Pyongyang claims the program is for peaceful energy development but experts say it could easily be converted to produce weapons-grade uranium.
Japan and South Korea have urged the United Nations Security Council to take up the issue with a view to possible punishment.
China opposes taking the issue to the world body even though President Hu Jintao has expressed concern at reports of the program.
China has warned its Security Council partners that it intends to block publication of a report on the subject, a diplomat at the United Nations told AFP last week.
The report says the North almost certainly has at least one other undisclosed enrichment-related facility and describes the uranium program as a serious violation of U.N. sanctions.
Beijing insists on the issue being discussed when six-party talks are revived.
President Lee Myung-Bak urged China to play a "constructive role" in resolving the nuclear crisis when he met Yang later, according to the presidential office.
Lee also stressed that a genuine change in North Korea's attitude is necessary for peace on the peninsula, it said.
Yang reportedly reaffirmed Beijing's objections to Pyongyang's nuclear weapons development and expressed hope inter-Korean relations would improve.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)