Study: Put General In Charge of U.S. Army's GCV

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - The U.S. Army appears to be taking seriously a new study that describes problems that plague service acquisition, from writing requirements to full-rate production.

• 
  

The Army announced it had commissioned the 120-day study last May and asked Gil Decker, a former Army acquisition executive, and retired Gen. Lou Wagner, who served as chief of the Army's Materiel Command, to lead the inquiry.
On the last day here of the Association of the U.S. Army's winter symposium, Wagner ran through the study's recommendations for improving the system. He was not originally on the conference's agenda, but was added after InsideDefense broke news of the study's findings in a Feb. 11 story.
While the study group has clearly outlined the scope of the acquisition problems, it remains to be seen whether its recommendations will lead to the kind of change required.
One of its recommendations is to put a general in charge of the Army's Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) program, currently led by a colonel. GCV and similarly complex acquisition category (ACAT) 1 programs need to have a general in charge, Wagner said.
If it were the Air Force, a three-star would be in charge, Wagner half-joked.
The Army's track record in getting programs out of technology development and into production does not bode well for GCV, planned as a successor to the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle. The acquisition process for the entire U.S. military requires scores upon scores of reviews and layers of bureaucracy that can slow things down, but the Army's recent history appears particularly bad.
From 1990 to 2010, the Army terminated 22 major programs, Wagner said. Of course, several of those fell under the umbrella of the multibillion-dollar Future Combat Systems effort, which was canceled in 2009. This has led to a loss of trust by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Congress and industry in the Army's ability to develop good requirements and move a system into production, Wagner said.
The study's recommendations fall into four broad categories:
* Make the requirements process collaborative and timely. This means bringing the key stakeholders in early from across the Army, something the service did do with GCV, Wagner said. For key ACAT 1 programs, the Army should establish a special task force chartered by the chief of staff or the secretary of the Army, Wagner said.
* Manage risk, don't be risk averse.
To this end, Wagner showed a chart that displayed how Army programs were categorized by risk, based on the amount of development work required. A program that intends to develop a system from scratch versus one that plans to upgrade an existing system does not need to go through the same process, Wagner said.
The Army should not undertake developing systems from the ground up unless the system is truly a game-changer, he added.
* Align organizations and accountability. For example, Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier should be renamed PEO Soldier and Small Unit. PEO Combat Support and Combat Service Support, which currently manages more than 500 systems, should be broken up into two offices,
* Provide adequate requirements and acquisition resources. To reduce funding instability, the Army could fence off funds for larger programs or fund them with a "capital account."
Wagner said he has briefed many people in the Pentagon on the study, including Pentagon acquisition chief Ashton Carter.
So far, the feedback has been very positive, he said.

AUSA: U.S. Army Plans Integrated Network Tests

FT. LAUDERDALE, Fla. - As the U.S. Army reinvents its network strategy, it is planning a busy year of tests and evaluations that will compare program-of-record technologies to other available equipment developed by industry.
The first event is scheduled for June and July at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., and the Army is calling it the Integrated Network Baseline Test. The six-week exercise includes a series of limited user tests for important Army network programs.

Limited user tests are designed to grade a system's performance and collect data that can be used when the Army or the Pentagon make a production decision.
The Integrated Network Baseline Test will include limited user tests for two Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) programs: the Ground Mobile Radio and the Handheld, Manpack, Small Form Fit radios. It also will include limited user tests for the Modern Soldier System and the Joint Capability Release, which is the next generation of Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below battle command capabilities.
The first four weeks will comprise the limited user tests, and during weeks five and six, the Army will conduct brigade-level exercises with non-program-of-record network technologies.
Each battalion in the brigade will have different sets of equipment so the Army can judge interoperability but also compare the capabilities to each other, said Paul Mehney, spokesman for Program Executive Office (PEO)-Integration.
In October, the Army will conduct what it's calling a Brigade Combat Team Integrated Exercise (BCT-IE). This event is designed to bring in emerging capabilities and non-program-of-record technologies and get them into the hands of soldiers, Mehney said.
It is the Army's chance to evaluate what is available and see what could be added to capability sets in the future.
For a company like Harris, which has a radio with capabilities similar to those developed under the JTRS program, the opportunity is exciting. The Army has indicated it wants to evaluate the company's AN/PRC-117G radio, which is a huge change from a year ago, said Dennis Moran, vice president of government business development at Harris.
This year's focus is the company command post and the aerial tier of the network infrastructure. The Army will be looking at the maturity of the technology and its ability to be integrated into the overall network.
A culminating event, called the Integrated Network Test, will take place late in 2012. It will determine what goes into the Army's capability set for 2013 and 2014, Mehney said.
Bringing all of these disparate systems together is a new approach for the Army, said Col. Michael Williamson, deputy PEO Integration.
It is being spearheaded by Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the vice chief of the Army, who directed the service to start testing the separate network pieces together despite their different levels of technological maturity, Williamson said.
The Army tried it out for the first time during a giant network demonstration in July. To pull that off, the program managers and PEOs involved performed integration work that normally would have been done two years from now, Williamson said.
Tests on this scale require a lot of resources in manpower and dollars, but by combining programs' test events, the Army hopes to offset the costs, Williamson said.

Arrow Intercepts Target in Test, Validates New Software

TEL AVIV - The U.S.-Israel Arrow program passed another milestone Feb. 22 with the spectacular, nighttime head-on intercept of a long-range target off the California coast.
Part of the ongoing, jointly funded Arrow System Improvement Program, the test validated new Block 4 versions designed to improve discriminating capabilities of the Arrow 2 interceptor, the Green Pine search-and-track radar and the Citron Tree battle management control system.

"To see that explosion off the shores of California was truly gratifying. It was a body-to-body impact that completely destroyed the target," Arieh Herzog, director of the Israel Missile Defense Organization (IMDO) told reporters via teleconference shortly after the nighttime launch at the U.S. Navy's Point Mugu Sea Range.
Herzog said validation of the Block 4 software would provide the Israel Air Force "with a better system than they have now." The software upgrades, he said, improve detection capabilities and lethality needed to defend against "new and different threats."
In a Feb. 22 statement, the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency (MDA) noted that the Green Pine radar successfully detected and tracked the target, transferred information to the Citron Tree management control system and launched the Arrow interceptor, "which performed its planned trajectory and destroyed the target missile."
The MDA statement noted that the test "represented a realistic scenario" and involved operationally ready elements of the Arrow weapon system.
In an interview earlier this month, Herzog said the sea-based target, provided by the MDA and launched from a mobile launch platform, was "representative of threats we face in this theater."
Herzog declined to provide details, but experts here said the target simulated increasingly longer-range missiles equipped with decoys designed to disorient and confuse defensive interceptors. A program official cited projected threats from upgraded versions of Syrian Scud-D and Iranian Shahab, Ashura and BM-25 missiles as drivers for continuous upgrades to Israel's defensive capabilities.
"We need to create all kinds of bodies in space to do discrimination against decoys. These features went into production with the Block 4," the program official said.
Herzog was more reticent on threats driving Block 4 requirements. He acknowledged, however, that Block 4 upgrades "improve the process of discrimination of what happens in the sky and the transmission of target data [to the Citron Tree battle management center] for much better situational control."
Finally, Block 4 upgrades to Arrow 2 interceptors refine midcourse guidance which, when coupled with improved target identification and discrimination capabilities, improves lethality.
Herzog added that Block 4 upgrades would be retrofitted into current Arrow 2 interceptors, as well as other program elements.
Udi Shani, MoD director-general, credited the close cooperation with the Pentagon's MDA and other U.S. defense establishment agencies for supporting the IMDO and Israel's efforts to deploy cutting-edge defense capabilities against escalating threats.
Meanwhile, IMDO and MDA are developing an upper-tier Arrow 3, an exoatmospheric, two-stage intercepting missile that uses pivoting optical sensors and its own upper-stage kick motor instead of separate control rockets to steer itself precisely into incoming targets. The so-called high-divert Arrow 3 is expected to weigh about half that of Arrow 2 and intercept maneuvering targets high in Earth's atmosphere.
In parallel, IMDO is working on a Block 5 upgrade aimed at merging the lower-tier Arrow 2 and the planned exo-atmospheric Arrow 3 into a single national missile defense system. The planned Block 5 Arrow weapon system will include new ground and airborne sensors, a command-and-control system, and a new high-performance target missile to simulate the Iranian Shahab and other potentially nuclear-capable delivery vehicles developed by Tehran.
The MLM Division of Israel Aerospace Industries is prime contractor for Arrow 2 and Arrow 3, with Chicago-based Boeing serving as subcontractor for production of critical components.
Last week's test completes a milestone held in abeyance since a July 2009 so-called "no test" due to software glitches. The glitch occurred when data transferred from the Green Pine radar to the battle management center erroneously showed intercept would take place out of the prescribed safety range, causing automatic mission abort.
Herzog said he expected the Israel Air Force to declare Block 4 versions of the Arrow 2 fully operational later this year.

Merkel 'Regrets' U.S. Tanker Decision

ERLIN - The U.S. Air Force's decision to award a huge tanker contract to Boeing is disappointing and Washington has missed a chance to deepen the transatlantic relationship, Germany's chancellor said Feb. 25.
"The chancellor ... took note of the decision with regret. From the German point of view this is a missed opportunity to deepen the transatlantic partnership," a spokesman for Angela Merkel told a regular briefing.

The Pentagon on Feb. 24 announced that Boeing had won the contract, worth over $30 billion, to supply aerial refueling tankers to the U.S. Air Force, at the end of a long and tortuous contest.
The head of EADS, Airbus' parent company, has already said he was "disappointed and perplexed" by the decision.
Germany's economy minister Rainer Bruederle also said Berlin considered the EADS offer an attractive one.
The U.S. firm is now tasked with delivering 18 aircraft by 2017, but the contract is expected to grow to 179 tankers.
The planes, effectively flying filling stations, give the U.S. aircraft global reach and allow Washington to project military power well beyond its borders.
The decision capped a nearly 10-year attempt by the U.S. Air Force to begin to replace an aging Boeing-built fleet of 400 tankers dating back to the 1950s.
But it was an upset, with most experts predicting the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company would land the contract.

France's Lagarde Confident About Airbus

SINGAPORE - French Economy Minister Christine Lagarde said Feb. 25 confident about Airbus' ability to compete in the global market after the European aircraft maker lost a key U.S. military contract to rival Boeing.
Lagarde, who is on a visit to Singapore, would not comment on the Pentagon's decision on Feb. 24 to award the $30 billion contract to supply aerial refueling tankers for the U.S. air force to Boeing.

"I have no comment at this stage," she told reporters.
"All I know is Airbus is a magnificent company and I have full trust and confidence in its ability to face competition and challenges of the markets," Lagarde told reporters.
A spokesman for German Chancellor Angela Merkel said in Berlin on Feb. 25 that the Pentagon's decision was disappointing and Washington had missed a chance to deepen the transatlantic relationship.
The head of EADS, Airbus' parent company, has also said he was "disappointed and perplexed" by the decision.
Boeing is now tasked with delivering 18 aircraft by 2017, but the contract is expected to grow to 179 tankers.
The planes, effectively flying filling stations, give the U.S. air force global reach and allow Washington to project military power well beyond its borders.
The decision capped a nearly 10-year attempt by the U.S. air force to begin to replace an ageing Boeing-built fleet of 400 tankers dating from the 1950s.

Father Of Soviet Submarines Dead At 91

SAINT PETERSBURG, Russia - Sergei Kovalyov, the father of the Soviet Union and Russia's nuclear submarine program, has died at the age of
91 in his native Saint Petersburg, his colleagues said Friday.

A towering figure in the secret world of strategic arsenals, Kovalyov is credited with designing 92 types of submarines at a time when Moscow and Washington fought a bitter war for supremacy of the world's seas.
He began his career in 1948, working at first on the design of a revolutionary S-99 model that became the fastest submarine in the Soviet Union's nascent naval forces.
Kovalyov began designing his first nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine in 1958, the same year he was appointed in charge of the Soviet Union's entire strategic naval forces program.
In a congratulatory message issued on Kovalyov's 90th birthday, President Dmitry Medvedev called him "a designer who has made an outstanding contribution to the development of the national ship building industry."
Most recently, Kovalyov was involved in designing off-shore oil and natural gas production platforms, an industry vital to Russia's efforts to develop the energy reserves trapped off its Pacific coast.

Pakistan Navy to participate in Aman 11 exercise

The top Pakistan and Chinese defense officials held a meeting where the new projects to expand their military cooperation, were discussed. The timely completion of the current projects was also an important part of the meeting.
Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee of the Pakistan Army Gen Khalid Shameem Wynne met Administrator of China”s State Administration of Science Technology and Industry for National Defence Chen Qiufa discussed the issues related to defense cooperation and the present and future projects that the two countries are involved together.
General Wynne is in China to take part in the eight round of Pakistna-China security dialogue and he publicly thanked Chen Qiufa for the support in all defense projects and showed his appreciation for the active of SASTING in ensuring the timely completion of all current joint projects.
At the moment the major supplier of weapon systems for Pakistan – China, is being involved in a list of defense projects which include the development of the new modern fighter – The JF-17 Thunder which is currently being produced in both countries and the engines for the fighters are being supplied by the Russian military.
China is also involved in the construction of Naval Frigates for the Pakistan Navy which has so far received three of those frigates and the fourth one is currently being constructed in the Karach Shipyard and Engineering Works with the cooperation of the Chinese navy.