WASHINGTON - The U.S. Army ordered the illegal use of psychological operations to influence American lawmakers on the Afghanistan war, Rolling Stone magazine reported Thursday, forcing the U.S. commander there to launch an inquiry.
The article said the command of Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, in charge of training Afghan troops, pressured U.S. soldiers specializing in "psy-ops" that normally influence enemy behavior, to manipulate visiting U.S. senators and congressmen - as well as other VIPs and senior foreign officials - into supporting more money and troops for the war.
The report shook up Washington at a time of growing public dissatisfaction with America's longest war, with lawmakers urging a swift investigation of the "disturbing" charges.
Pentagon spokesman Col. David Lapan said war commander Gen. David Petraeus "is preparing to order an investigation" to determine "what actions took place and if any of them was inappropriate or illegal."
The report says a lieutenant colonel told the magazine he had been repeatedly ordered by Caldwell's staff to target senators including 2008 Republican presidential nominee John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Jack Reed, Al Franken and Carl Levin, to get Caldwell's message across.
Among those the team was told to pressure during a four-month period were Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, Germany's interior minister, and the Czech ambassador to Kabul, according to members of the "information operations" (IO) team and internal documents.
And when the officer sought to bring the operation to a halt, a campaign of retaliation was launched against him, according to the magazine.
"My job in psy-ops is to play with people's heads, to get the enemy to behave the way we want them to behave," Lt. Col. Michael Holmes, leader of the IO unit, told Rolling Stone.
"I'm prohibited from doing that to our own people. When you ask me to try to use these skills on senators and congressman, you're crossing a line."
The magazine also said Caldwell's chief of staff asked Holmes how the general could secretly manipulate the U.S. lawmakers.
"How do we get these guys to give us more people?" the chief of staff demanded. "What do I have to plant inside their heads?"
Reed, a Democrat who sits on key committees with oversight over the conflict, called the charges "serious and disturbing, and they have to be fully investigated."
An inquiry will likely check whether the IO effort was in violation of U.S. law that forbids targeting U.S. nationals with such propaganda campaigns.
Both Reed and Levin, the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, denied they had been influenced by the effort.
The report was the second scoop on the military affairs front by the music magazine in under a year.
In 2010, Michael Hastings, the same writer as of Thursday's article, wrote a withering critique of Petraeus' predecessor Gen. Stanley McChrystal and his staff, attributing blunt comments to the commander's staff which led to his ouster.
Hastings wrote that Holmes, who became the subject of an army investigation after e-mailing a military lawyer to address his discomfort with the psy-op orders on U.S. civilians, said Caldwell "seemed far more focused on the Americans and the funding stream than he was on the Afghans.
"We were there to teach and train the Afghans. But for the first four months it was all about the U.S.," he added. "Later he even started talking about targeting the NATO populations."
In response to Holmes's e-mail, military lawyer Capt. John Scott agreed with Holmes and wrote that the "IO doesn't do that," according to the report.
"[Public affairs] works on the hearts and minds of our own citizens and IO works on the hearts and minds of the citizens of other nations," Scott wrote.
"While the twain do occasionally intersect, such intersections ... should be unintentional."
In a statement to the magazine, a Caldwell spokesman "categorically denies the assertion that the command used an Information Operations Cell to influence distinguished visitors."
The article said the command of Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, in charge of training Afghan troops, pressured U.S. soldiers specializing in "psy-ops" that normally influence enemy behavior, to manipulate visiting U.S. senators and congressmen - as well as other VIPs and senior foreign officials - into supporting more money and troops for the war.
The report shook up Washington at a time of growing public dissatisfaction with America's longest war, with lawmakers urging a swift investigation of the "disturbing" charges.
Pentagon spokesman Col. David Lapan said war commander Gen. David Petraeus "is preparing to order an investigation" to determine "what actions took place and if any of them was inappropriate or illegal."
The report says a lieutenant colonel told the magazine he had been repeatedly ordered by Caldwell's staff to target senators including 2008 Republican presidential nominee John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Jack Reed, Al Franken and Carl Levin, to get Caldwell's message across.
Among those the team was told to pressure during a four-month period were Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, Germany's interior minister, and the Czech ambassador to Kabul, according to members of the "information operations" (IO) team and internal documents.
And when the officer sought to bring the operation to a halt, a campaign of retaliation was launched against him, according to the magazine.
"My job in psy-ops is to play with people's heads, to get the enemy to behave the way we want them to behave," Lt. Col. Michael Holmes, leader of the IO unit, told Rolling Stone.
"I'm prohibited from doing that to our own people. When you ask me to try to use these skills on senators and congressman, you're crossing a line."
The magazine also said Caldwell's chief of staff asked Holmes how the general could secretly manipulate the U.S. lawmakers.
"How do we get these guys to give us more people?" the chief of staff demanded. "What do I have to plant inside their heads?"
Reed, a Democrat who sits on key committees with oversight over the conflict, called the charges "serious and disturbing, and they have to be fully investigated."
An inquiry will likely check whether the IO effort was in violation of U.S. law that forbids targeting U.S. nationals with such propaganda campaigns.
Both Reed and Levin, the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, denied they had been influenced by the effort.
The report was the second scoop on the military affairs front by the music magazine in under a year.
In 2010, Michael Hastings, the same writer as of Thursday's article, wrote a withering critique of Petraeus' predecessor Gen. Stanley McChrystal and his staff, attributing blunt comments to the commander's staff which led to his ouster.
Hastings wrote that Holmes, who became the subject of an army investigation after e-mailing a military lawyer to address his discomfort with the psy-op orders on U.S. civilians, said Caldwell "seemed far more focused on the Americans and the funding stream than he was on the Afghans.
"We were there to teach and train the Afghans. But for the first four months it was all about the U.S.," he added. "Later he even started talking about targeting the NATO populations."
In response to Holmes's e-mail, military lawyer Capt. John Scott agreed with Holmes and wrote that the "IO doesn't do that," according to the report.
"[Public affairs] works on the hearts and minds of our own citizens and IO works on the hearts and minds of the citizens of other nations," Scott wrote.
"While the twain do occasionally intersect, such intersections ... should be unintentional."
In a statement to the magazine, a Caldwell spokesman "categorically denies the assertion that the command used an Information Operations Cell to influence distinguished visitors."
No comments:
Post a Comment